Facebook shareholders try and fail to limit Mark Zuckerberg's power
Calls for Mark Zuckerberg's power to be reined in continue to grow louder – not that it matters.
That much was clear during Facebook's annual shareholders meeting on Thursday, where Zuckerberg faced numerous calls for his power to be checked. On the agenda were four shareholder proposals that called for new checks on Zuckerberg's power:
A proposal calling for more shareholder a power
A proposal calling for an independent board chair (not Zuck)
A proposal which compared Zuckerberg's control of the company to a "dictatorship," for shareholder input in elections to the board of directors
A proposal to explore "strategic alternatives," including breaking up Facebook into separate companies
But going over these initiatives were mostly a symbolic gesture as Facebook's board, once again, easily voted down all shareholder proposals. As Bloomberg pointed out earlier this week, such proposals are all essentially dead on arrival, since Zuckerberg controls the vast majority of the company's most powerful shares.
SEE ALSO:'Fire Zuck' projected onto location of Facebook shareholders' meetingZuckerberg seemed mostly unfazed by all this. He said addressing the "social issues" facing the company is one of his top priorities.
"This is an important period for the company...we're fighting to do the right thing every day," he said.
Still, shareholders in attendance made it clear they want to see Facebook change.
During the meeting's Q&A period, one questioner asked Facebook's lead independent director, Susan Desmond-Hellmann, if she was willing to exercise her authority to call a board meeting without Zuckerberg in order to oust the CEO.
She said no. "That's not the direction we want to take the company or the board," she said.
Tweet may have been deleted
Another attendee posed a similar question to Zuckerberg, asking if he would respond to people who want him to give up some of his power. Facebook's founder sidestepped the question by repeating his calls for increased regulation.
"I do acknowledge there are limits to what an individual company should deciding," he said.
That wasn't really an answer to the question that was asked, but it was a deft move that allowed the CEO to avoid addressing calls for him to step down or relinquish his control directly.
Most of all, it was a powerful reminder to Zuckerberg's critics that he's not going away any time soon.
Featured Video For You
Facebook to launch its own cryptocurrency in 2020
TopicsActivismFacebookSocial Media
相关文章
Yoon, US Senate's armed service committee chief discuss alliance, N.K. threats
President Yoon Suk Yeol (right) shakes hands with Sen. Jack Reed, chairman of the US Senate's a2024-09-22Viral bookshop sign perfectly captures the beauty of British humour in a crisis
It takes a lot to laugh in a state of despair, but a little bookshop in the English town of Fowey se2024-09-22With the new iPhones, Face ID is ubiquitous. But I refuse to use it.
Since Apple first gave me the option to use my physical human body as a key, I've felt uncomfortable2024-09-22Viral bookshop sign perfectly captures the beauty of British humour in a crisis
It takes a lot to laugh in a state of despair, but a little bookshop in the English town of Fowey se2024-09-22- 8月26日,市委书记夏凤俭在雅与四川建安工业有限责任公司董事长耿海波一行座谈。双方分别介绍了雅安经济社会发展情况和企业生产经营情况,围绕推动企业科技创新、扩大投资布局、做强产业集群、开拓市场空间等方面2024-09-22
Police implement a solution to swatting, and it's spreading
Andrew Finch was shot dead by police on Dec. 28, 2017. Officials hope a new system will prevent a si2024-09-22
最新评论